[하루리딩] 기업 책임 : 데이터 프라이버시 보호 필요성

소개글

오늘은 디지털 시대의 기업 책임과 데이터 프라이버시에 대해 읽어보겠습니다.

최근 쿠팡의 데이터 유출 사건은 기업의 책임이 얼마나 중요한지를 보여줍니다.

소비자와 기업 간의 신뢰는 현대 사회와 경제에서 큰 의미를 가집니다.

하루 리딩 공부

Coupang's new CEO, Harold Rogers, faced intense scrutiny during a recent parliamentary hearing regarding a significant data breach.

The breach has compromised the personal data of over 33 million customers, raising serious concerns about data privacy.

Coupang's founder, Kim Bom-suk, was criticized for not attending the hearing, which many viewed as an attempt to evade accountability.

He cited overseas commitments as the reason for his absence, which did not sit well with lawmakers.

Rogers was appointed as the interim CEO just a week prior to the hearing, leading to speculation about his role as a shield for Kim.

Members of the National Assembly expressed their frustration at Kim's lack of responsibility towards the incident.

Committee chair, Rep. Choi Min-hee, stated that a full parliamentary investigation would be initiated.

He emphasized that Kim should face legal consequences for the breach.

Another lawmaker highlighted that executives from major global companies like Meta and Amazon have appeared before U.S. Congress when faced with similar situations.

The absence of Kim raised questions about corporate accountability in South Korea.

Many believe that leaders should be present in crucial discussions about their companies' failures.

The hearing aimed to address the steps needed to protect consumer data in the future.

Lawmakers are keen on ensuring that such breaches do not happen again.

The outrage reflects a growing demand for transparency in corporate governance.

Consumers are increasingly aware of their rights regarding personal data.

The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the responsibilities of tech companies.

There is a call for stricter regulations to protect user information.

Coupang's situation serves as a warning to other companies about the importance of accountability.

Legislators are pushing for laws that hold executives accountable for data privacy issues.

This case highlights the tension between corporate practices and public trust.

실전 문제들

TOEIC Reading

1. What was the main reason for the parliamentary hearing?

   A) To discuss new product launches
   B) To address a data breach
   C) To evaluate company profits
   D) To introduce the new CEO

2. What did the lawmakers demand regarding the founder's absence?

   A) They wanted him to resign
   B) They wanted him to be punished
   C) They wanted him to attend
   D) They wanted him to increase CEO salaries

IELTS Reading

1. What was the outcome of the hearing for Coupang's founder?

   A) He was praised for his leadership
   B) He was criticized for evading responsibility
   C) He announced a new strategy
   D) He resigned immediately

2. Which company was mentioned as having executives appear before Congress?

   A) Coupang
   B) Meta
   C) Apple
   D) Samsung

TOEFL Reading

1. What is the significance of the data breach discussed in the article?

   A) It affects only a small number of customers
   B) It raises concerns about data privacy
   C) It is a common occurrence
   D) It has no legal implications

2. How did lawmakers react to the new CEO's presence at the hearing?

   A) They welcomed him warmly
   B) They were indifferent
   C) They were frustrated with his appointment
   D) They praised his previous experience

마무리글

오늘 우리는 데이터 유출 사건을 통해 기업의 책임에 대해 이해했습니다.

이 글을 통해 독해, 추론 및 문맥 속 어휘 활용 능력을 연습했습니다.

기업의 투명성과 책임이 소비자 신뢰에 미치는 영향에 대해 다시 한 번 생각해보는 기회였습니다.

정답·해설 보러가기